Titre :
|
Validity of Risk Assessment Instruments Among Juveniles Who Sexually Offended: Victim Age Matters (2021)
|
Auteurs :
|
Chiara KRAUSE, Auteur ;
Alexander ROTH, Auteur ;
Markus A LANDOLT, Auteur ;
Cornelia BESSLER, Auteur ;
Marcel AEBI, Auteur
|
Type de document :
|
Article : texte imprimé
|
Dans :
|
Sexual Abuse (Vol. 33 - N° 4, June 2021)
|
Article en page(s) :
|
pp. 379-405
|
Langues:
|
Anglais
|
Index. décimale :
|
VS.33 (Violence sexuelle agie chez l'adolescent et l'enfant)
|
Catégories :
|
ADOLESCENT
AGE
AGRESSEUR MINEUR
AGRESSION SEXUELLE
AUTEUR DE VIOLENCE SEXUELLE
ECHELLE D'EVALUATION
ENFANT
EVALUATION
RECIDIVISME
RISQUE
VICTIME MAJEURE
VICTIME MINEURE
|
Mots-clés:
|
Age de la victime
|
Résumé :
|
Research has identified meaningful subtypes among the heterogeneous population of juveniles who sexually offended (JSO). However, studies that test the validity of risk assessment tools with JSO subtypes are limited. This study compared JSO who offended against a child victim (JSO-C) and JSO who offended against an adolescent/adult victim (JSO-A) with regard to rates of recidivism and the predictive validity of two risk assessment tools (Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism [ERASOR] and Juvenile Sexual Offender Assessment Protocol-II [J-SOAP-II]). Data were analyzed from case files of 185 JSO-C and 297 JSO-A aged 12 to 18 years (M = 14.11, SD = 1.44) from a consecutive sample of JSO with contact sexual offenses. A total of 34 (7.1%) juveniles reoffended sexually, with no significant difference between the subtypes. The present results suggest that the ERASOR, particularly the structured professional judgment, and to a lesser degree the J-SOAP-II are better suited to predicting sexual recidivism in JSO-A than in JSO-C. [Résumé d'éditeur]
|
Article disponible :
|
CRIAVS Franche-Comté/ERIOS
|
Type de document CRIAVS :
|
Article
|
Obtenir le document :
|
Contactez le CRIAVS de votre région
|
En ligne :
|
https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220910719
|